Walker v. California Department of Corrections

Full title: K. JAMEL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 3, 2015

2:09-cv-0569 WBS KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2015)

Opinion

K. JAMEL WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:09-cv-0569 WBS KJN PS United States District Court, E.D. California. December 3, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         On November 12, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order, filed October 30, 2015, denying plaintiff's motion for additional discovery. Pursuant to Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." (Id.) Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed October 30, 2015 is affirmed.

         2. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 65) is denied.