From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wales v. Trung

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 16, 2009
Civil No. 08-39 (JNE/JJK) (D. Minn. Dec. 16, 2009)

Summary

examining the evidence submitted by the movant in support of a Motion for Summary Judgment on the merits, where the plaintiff had failed to respond

Summary of this case from LOL FINANCE COMPANY v. FAISON

Opinion

Civil No. 08-39 (JNE/JJK).

December 16, 2009


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 12, 2009. Plaintiff, an inmate at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, from January 3, 2005, to April 14, 2009, brought this action challenging the medical care he received while in confinement. Plaintiff asserts a host of constitutional, statutory, and common law claims. The magistrate judge recommended that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's objection [Docket No. 145] to the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 144] is OVERRULED.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 130] is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 104] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Wales v. Trung

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 16, 2009
Civil No. 08-39 (JNE/JJK) (D. Minn. Dec. 16, 2009)

examining the evidence submitted by the movant in support of a Motion for Summary Judgment on the merits, where the plaintiff had failed to respond

Summary of this case from LOL FINANCE COMPANY v. FAISON
Case details for

Wales v. Trung

Case Details

Full title:Thomas W. Wales, Plaintiff, v. Tran Trung, individually and in his…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Dec 16, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-39 (JNE/JJK) (D. Minn. Dec. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Bureau of Prisons

However, the ADA “does not apply to an inmate confined in a federal prison.” Wales v. Trung, No.…

LOL FINANCE COMPANY v. FAISON

From the Herring Defendants' Answer, the only facts alleged in the Complaint which were denied, are whether…