Walen v. Sprint

Full title: RAYMOND C. WALEN, JR., Plaintiff, v. SPRINT, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 3, 2008

Case No. 06-14201 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 3, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 06-14201.

January 3, 2008

ORDER

R. WHALEN, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Add as a Defendant Embarq Payphone Services, Inc. [Docket #25]. Counsel for Defendant "Sprint," maintaining its argument that "Sprint" is not an entity capable of being sued¹, does not object to adding Embarq Payphone Services, Inc. as the proper party in this action.

1 See Motion to Dismiss [Docket #22], which will be considered in a separate Report and Recommendation. In the Motion to Dismiss, counsel for "Sprint" agreed to answer on behalf of Embarq within 10 days of a substitution of Embarq for Sprint.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Add Defendant [Docket #25] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.