From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WALDO v. P.W. TULLY'S WOODSTOCK STUD, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 31, 1994
202 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County (Torraca, J.).


Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in granting defendants' motion to amend the answer to plead the Statute of Limitations. In the absence of any claim of surprise or prejudice by plaintiff, we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion (see, Fahey v. County of Ontario, 44 N.Y.2d 934; Kramer Sons v. Facilities Dev. Corp., 135 A.D.2d 942; Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. Sheldon, 124 A.D.2d 428).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

WALDO v. P.W. TULLY'S WOODSTOCK STUD, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 31, 1994
202 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

WALDO v. P.W. TULLY'S WOODSTOCK STUD, INC

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK WALDO, Appellant, v. P.W. TULLY'S WOODSTOCK STUD, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 891

Citing Cases

Mushatt v. Tompkins Community Hospital

Plaintiff also appeals from an order which granted the hospital's motion to amend its answer to include a…