Opinion
Case No. Civ-F-04-5278 OWW DLB.
March 15, 2006
MICHAEL J. COFFINO, ANN M. HEIMBERGER, STEEFEL, LEVITT WEISS, A Professional Corporation, One Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA.
ALISON H. MIJARES, STEEFEL, LEVITT WEISS, A Professional Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST.
JARVIS FAY DOPORTO LLP, Rick W. Jarvis, Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF TURLOCK and TURLOCK CITY COUNCIL.
On March 10, 2006 at 2:00 p.m., the Court heard the motion of Plaintiffs Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust to Strike Defendants' Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Leave to File Further Brief in Response.
Michael J. Coffino of Steefel, Levitt Weiss, PC, appeared for plaintiffs and Rick W. Jarvis and Ben Fay of Jarvis, Fay and Doporto, LLP, for defendants. All counsel appeared telephonically. After oral argument, the Court ordered as follows:
1. Wal-Mart may file a response on or before March 24, 2006, to any arguments contained in the City's Supplemental Reply Memorandum, filed on February 27, 2006 (Docket No. 207), that Wal-Mart did not address in its Supplemental Memorandum filed on February 21, 2006 (Docket No. 204); and
2. Neither side may file any further briefing related to the pending Motion for summary judgment that the City filed on March 29, 2005 (Docket No. 50).
IT IS SO ORDERED.