From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wakemed v. N.C. Dep't of Health

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 12, 2013
743 S.E.2d 205 (N.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 428P12.

2013-06-12

WAKEMED v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION, CERTIFICATE OF NEED SECTION. and Rex Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Rex Healthcare, Holly Springs Surgery Center, LLC, and Novant Health, Inc., Respondent–Intervenors, Rex Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Rex Healthcare v. North Carolina Department of Health And Human Services, Division Of Health Service Regulation, Certificate of Need Section and WakeMed, Holly Springs Surgery Center, LLC, and Novant Health, Inc., Respondent–Intervenor.

Gary S. Qualls, Morrisville, for Rex Hospital, Inc., et al. Maureen D. Murray, Greensboro, for WakeMed.


Gary S. Qualls, Morrisville, for Rex Hospital, Inc., et al. Maureen D. Murray, Greensboro, for WakeMed.
Terrill Johnson Harris, Greensboro.

Allyson Jones Labban, Greensboro.

Scott T. Stroud, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department of Health and Human Services.

Marcus C. Hewitt, Raleigh, for Holly Springs Surgery Center, LLC, et al.

Brian C. Vick, Raleigh.

Colleen M. Crowley, Morrisville.

Susan K. Hackney, Morrisville.

Elizabeth Sims Hedrick, Raleigh.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of October 2012 by Petitioner (Wake Med) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of June 2013.”


Summaries of

Wakemed v. N.C. Dep't of Health

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 12, 2013
743 S.E.2d 205 (N.C. 2013)
Case details for

Wakemed v. N.C. Dep't of Health

Case Details

Full title:WAKEMED v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

743 S.E.2d 205 (N.C. 2013)

Citing Cases

In re M.A.W.

) In a conclusion of law, however, the trial court specifically found that Michael was born on 5 August 2009.…