From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wainwright v. Cumberledge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 14, 1915
151 P. 847 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 5218

Opinion Filed September 14, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Dudley, C.)

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Preston B. Cole, Assigned Judge.

Action by G.F. Cumberledge against W.H. Wainwright. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case were filed in this court on June 12, 1913; neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The judgment of tthe trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Wainwright v. Cumberledge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 14, 1915
151 P. 847 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Wainwright v. Cumberledge

Case Details

Full title:WAINWRIGHT v. CUMBERLEDGE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 14, 1915

Citations

151 P. 847 (Okla. 1915)
151 P. 847