From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waikiki v. Ho'Omaka Vill. Ass'n of Apartment Owners

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
May 27, 2016
SCWC-16-0000011 (Haw. May. 27, 2016)

Opinion

SCWC-16-0000011

05-27-2016

RAEVYN WAIKIKI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. HO'OMAKA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, Respondent/Defendant-Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee, and VIOLET JHUN, Petitioner/Defendant-Cross-Claim Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and WADE KIOSHI KALEOLANI SHIMOJO, Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

Walter R. Schoettle for petitioner Violet Jhun Richard Turbin, Rai Saint Chu, and Janice D. Heidt for respondent Wade Kioshi Kaleolani Shimojo


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-16-0000011; CIV. NO. 13-1-2391-09) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
()

Petitioner Violet Jhun's application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 14, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 27, 2016. Walter R. Schoettle for petitioner Violet Jhun Richard Turbin, Rai Saint Chu, and Janice D. Heidt for respondent Wade Kioshi Kaleolani Shimojo

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

Waikiki v. Ho'Omaka Vill. Ass'n of Apartment Owners

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
May 27, 2016
SCWC-16-0000011 (Haw. May. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Waikiki v. Ho'Omaka Vill. Ass'n of Apartment Owners

Case Details

Full title:RAEVYN WAIKIKI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: May 27, 2016

Citations

SCWC-16-0000011 (Haw. May. 27, 2016)