holding consumer fraud claims alleging misleading advertising were preempted by the ADA
Summary of this case from Seklecki v. Ctr. for Disease Control & PreventionNo. 94-1422.
Decided February 17, 1995.
Appeal from D.Md., 844 F.Supp. 247.
AFFIRMED.
holding consumer fraud claims alleging misleading advertising were preempted by the ADA
Summary of this case from Seklecki v. Ctr. for Disease Control & Preventionrejecting defendant's argument about vagueness of Guidelines cocaine base and bolstering conclusion by noting commentary mentions cocaine base is synonymous with crack
Summary of this case from United States v. Litzydiscussing Chaney, 142 So. at 104
Summary of this case from Northcutt v. United StatesIn Jones, there was indeed a sign which specifically prohibited the maneuver performed by the motorist, and on which the detaining officers actually relied.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BeckmanFull title:Wagman v. Federal Express Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Feb 17, 1995
Cargolux Motion at 9. The Cargolux Defendants rely, inter alia, upon an unreported decision of the Fourth…
U.S. v. ZapataThe composite central computer records being offered as evidence in this case present an additional problem…