From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Miami Dade Bd. of Cty. Commr's

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 8, 2006
922 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-1192.

March 8, 2006.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jon I. Gordon, Judge.

Bierman, Shohat, Loewy Pizzi, and Michael A. Pizzi, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Murray A. Greenberg, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Robert A. Duvall, Craig H. Coller and Lee Kraftchick, Assistant County Attorneys.

Miguel DeGrandy, and Stephen M. Cody, Coral Gables, for Citizens against Redland Incorporation, Inc. as amicus curiae.

Before SHEPHERD, SUAREZ and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


Affirmed. See Pino v. District Ct. of App., Third Dist., 604 So.2d 1232, 1233 (Fla. 1992) (mandamus is not appropriate where the petitioner has other legal methods for obtaining relief); Williams v. Schulman, 721 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (petitioner not entitled to mandamus where an adequate remedy at law was available); Miami-Dade County v. Palmetto Bay, 744 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (whether to "move forward towards authorizing incorporation" is a "discretionary political decision").


Summaries of

Wade v. Miami Dade Bd. of Cty. Commr's

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 8, 2006
922 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Wade v. Miami Dade Bd. of Cty. Commr's

Case Details

Full title:Patricia WADE and The Friends of Redland, Inc., Appellants/Petitioners, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 8, 2006

Citations

922 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Henley v. State

Henley did not raise this issue on direct appeal or in his several post-conviction motions. Mandamus is not…

Henley v. State

Henley did not raise this issue on direct appeal or in his several post-conviction motions. Mandamus is not…