From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W. L. E. Ry. Co. v. Ry. P. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 26, 1932
186 N.E. 96 (Ohio 1932)

Opinion

No. 23701

Decided October 26, 1932.

Supreme Court — Digmissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Ottawa county.

Mr. John W. Hackett, Mr. Charles H. Graves, Messrs. Squire, Sanders Dempsey and Mr. F.B. Shaw, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Tracy, Chapman Welles, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., MATTHIAS, DAY, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

W. L. E. Ry. Co. v. Ry. P. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 26, 1932
186 N.E. 96 (Ohio 1932)
Case details for

W. L. E. Ry. Co. v. Ry. P. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WHEELING LAKE ERIE RY. CO. v. NORTHWESTERN OHIO RY. POWER CO. ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 26, 1932

Citations

186 N.E. 96 (Ohio 1932)
186 N.E. 96