From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vurimindi v. Office of Dist. Attorney

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Dec 24, 2015
129 A.3d 1235 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 141 EM 2015.

12-24-2015

Vamsidhar VURIMINDI, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA and Office of Attorney General, Commonwealth of PA and Hon. Judge Sheila Woods–Skipper and Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, Respondents.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Vurimindi v. Office of Dist. Attorney

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Dec 24, 2015
129 A.3d 1235 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Vurimindi v. Office of Dist. Attorney

Case Details

Full title:VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 24, 2015

Citations

129 A.3d 1235 (Pa. 2015)