From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vulovich v. Baich

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 19, 1956
135 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1956)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 1956

Decided April 19, 1956

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, OTTAWAY, J.

Francis J. Riordan for appellants.

Edmond J. Shea for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. In reaching the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed, we do not find it necessary to rule upon the applicability of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: FROESSEL, J.


Summaries of

Vulovich v. Baich

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 19, 1956
135 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1956)
Case details for

Vulovich v. Baich

Case Details

Full title:RATKO VULOVICH et al., Appellants, v. STEPHEN P. BAICH, Respondent, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 19, 1956

Citations

135 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1956)
135 N.E.2d 40
152 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

Tichonchuk v. Orloff

Therefore, section 347 of the Civil Practice Act would bar plaintiff's testimony upon the trial of the…

M.M. G., Inc. v. Jackson

Welsh v. Welsh, 254 Md. 681, 255 A.2d 368, 372 (1969) (emphasis added). Accord, Michael v. Davis, 372 So.2d…