From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vought v. Gedney

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1900
31 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

May, 1900.

John F. Meyer, for appellants.

Johnston Johnston, for respondent.


This is a general appeal by the two defendants. The exceptions on which the appellants rely were taken by both appellants and not separately. As to one of the appellants the rulings were right. It has frequently been held that a general exception by two defendants to a ruling which was not erroneous as to one of them, is not available on behalf of the other. Bosley v. National Machine Co., 123 N.Y. 551; Markham v. Washburn, 45 N.Y. St. Repr. 683, and cases there cited. It was also held by the Court of Appeals in Schoonmaker v. Bonnie, 119 N.Y. 566, that a judgment will not be reversed as to one of several parties appellant, although erroneous in law as to him, upon a general exception by him, in the absence of a sufficient exception pointing out the particular error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Present: TRUAX, P.J.; SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Vought v. Gedney

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1900
31 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Vought v. Gedney

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN F. VOUGHT, Respondent, v . WILLIAM A. GEDNEY et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: May 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Patterson et al. v. Meyer

It is further insisted by the defendant in error that the proceeding in error is prosecuted jointly by the…