From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Votava v. Palm Rest. of Las Vegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01936-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01936-GMN-CWH

03-01-2013

JOSEPH C. VOTAVA, Plaintiff, v. PALM RESTAURANT OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) of the Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, entered January 7, 2013. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by January 24, 2013. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED, with prejudice for failure to file a completed Application by January 3, 2013.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for failure to pay the filing fee.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

_________

Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Votava v. Palm Rest. of Las Vegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01936-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Votava v. Palm Rest. of Las Vegas

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. VOTAVA, Plaintiff, v. PALM RESTAURANT OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01936-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)