From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voss v. Baca

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 21, 2016
No. 69900 (Nev. App. Jun. 21, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69900

06-21-2016

STEVEN FLOYD VOSS, Appellant, v. ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Jerome M. Polaha, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3). --------

Steven Voss filed his petition on April 1, 2015, nearly 15 years after issuance of the remittitur on direct appeal on June 20, 2000. Voss v. State, Docket No. 32830 (Order Vacating in Part and Affirming in Part, May 24, 2000). Thus, Voss' petition was untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Voss' petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause—cause for the delay and undue prejudice. See id. Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, Voss was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2).

Voss claims he has good cause to raise his ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim because the district court erroneously found in his first timely postconviction petition that Voss waived this claim because the underlying claim could have been raised on direct appeal. Voss fails to demonstrate good cause because, while it does appear the district court denied this claim in his first petition on erroneous grounds, Voss' remedy was to raise the claim on appeal from the denial of his first petition. Voss has not alleged ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel for failure to raise the claim on appeal and we note a claim of ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel would not provide relief because Voss was not entitled to the effective assistance of postconviction counsel. Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303, 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159, 164, 912 P.2d 255, 258 (1996); see also Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. ___, ___, 331 P.3d 867, 871-72 (2014).

Further, we conclude Voss failed to overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State. Therefore, the district court properly dismissed the petition as procedurally barred, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge

Steven Floyd Voss

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Voss v. Baca

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 21, 2016
No. 69900 (Nev. App. Jun. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Voss v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FLOYD VOSS, Appellant, v. ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 21, 2016

Citations

No. 69900 (Nev. App. Jun. 21, 2016)