From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vore v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Sep 28, 2015
Case No. 1:13-cv-800 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-800

09-28-2015

WILLIAM BERNARD VORE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, RICHLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Mcrz

ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENT TO REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

The Court has reviewed the Supplement to Reports and Recommendations on Motion for Relief from Judgment of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 47), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 41) is DENIED. September 28, 2015.

/s/_________

Susan J. Dlott

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vore v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Sep 28, 2015
Case No. 1:13-cv-800 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Vore v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BERNARD VORE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, RICHLAND CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Sep 28, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-800 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)