Summary
using "multiplicious" in the body of the decision
Summary of this case from United States v. ShipleyOpinion
No. 94-15877.
January 30, 1996.
E.D.Cal.
DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS
AFFIRMED
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Vontz Sons v. American Agrisurance, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 30, 1996
76 F.3d 390 (9th Cir. 1996)
Summaries of
Vontz Sons v. American Agrisurance, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 30, 1996
76 F.3d 390 (9th Cir. 1996)
using "multiplicious" in the body of the decision
Summary of this case from United States v. Shipleyusing Rule 6 to extend removal filing deadline from thirtieth day, which landed on a Sunday, to the following Monday
Summary of this case from Bermudez v. Wal-Mart Stores Texasstating that "a plea for leniency based on factors other than those contemplated by section 2255 . . . is not cognizable under section 2255"
Summary of this case from Bedewi v. U.S.using Rule 6 to extend removal filing deadline from thirtieth day, which landed on a Sunday, to the following Monday
Summary of this case from ELL DOLORES FREEZE v. COASTAL BEND FOOT SPECIALISTCase details for
Vontz Sons v. American Agrisurance, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:Vontz Sons v. American Agrisurance, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Jan 30, 1996
Citations
76 F.3d 390 (9th Cir. 1996)
Citing Cases
U.S. v. Dugan
Dugan's post-sentencing rehabilitation and education are not circumstances, standing alone, that provide a…
U.S. v. AbdallahNo additional instruction was needed to define "medically required" because it was used consistent with its…