Opinion
88723
06-28-2024
FERRILL JOSEPH VOLPICELLI, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GARRETT, Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
ORDER DENYING PETITION
Cadish, C.J.
This is a pro se original petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging petitioner's sentence. Having considered the petition, and the supplement to the petition filed on June 25, 2024, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy available to him by way of an appeal from the district court's denial of such relief in the first instance. See NRAP 22 ("An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order denying the writ."); Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is not a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Stiglich, J., Herndon, J.