From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volman v. Santa Clarita Rest. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2021
21 Civ. 4742 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 4742 (AT)

09-20-2021

JOSEF VOLMAN. Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARITA RESTAURANT CORP, and 237 WILLIS AVENUE REALTY LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge

On September 17, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. ECF No. 26. That motion did not comply with Rule III(M) and Attachment A of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, which require, among other things: (1) a motion brought on by proposed order to show cause; (2) an affidavit or declaration signed by a party with personal knowledge (i.e. not the attorney in the action except in limited circumstances), which sets forth a statement of proposed damages and the basis for each element of damages; (3) a separate affidavit stating the basis for default judgment, among other matters; and (4) a proposed default judgment, a certificate of default, copies of the pleadings, and the affidavit of service for the summons and complaint, all attached to the second affidavit.

Accordingly, Plaintiff s motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. By October 4, 2021. Plaintiff shall submit a renewed motion for default judgment that complies with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 26.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Volman v. Santa Clarita Rest. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2021
21 Civ. 4742 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Volman v. Santa Clarita Rest. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEF VOLMAN. Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARITA RESTAURANT CORP, and 237 WILLIS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 4742 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2021)