From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

October, 1927.


The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that upon the facts here the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, and that the plaintiff's evidence called for some explanation by the defendant as to the cause of the collapse of the glass panel in the door. Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Vogel v. Union Dime Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:WALTER VOGEL, Appellant, v. UNION DIME SAVINGS BANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1927

Citations

221 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Silberman v. Lazarowitz

We find that the facts adduced at the trial sufficiently established the requisite elements so as to sustain…

Gross v. Temp Realty Corp.

The broad expanse of clear glass, nine and one-half feet in height by six and one-half feet in width, may…