From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vogel v. Landmark Am. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 31, 2022
Civ. 6:21-cv-00323-MK (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 6:21-cv-00323-MK

03-31-2022

O.D. CHRISTINA VOGEL, Plaintiff, v. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 23), and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) is adopted in full. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 9) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vogel v. Landmark Am. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 31, 2022
Civ. 6:21-cv-00323-MK (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Vogel v. Landmark Am. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:O.D. CHRISTINA VOGEL, Plaintiff, v. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

Civ. 6:21-cv-00323-MK (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2022)