Opinion
October 23, 1997
Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.).
Plaintiff's defamation cause of action, which is premised upon the contents of a letter written by opposing counsel and sent to plaintiff and directly to plaintiff's client during the course of negotiations to settle a copyright lawsuit threatened by plaintiff's client, was properly dismissed by the court on the ground that the letter was absolutely privileged ( Caplan v Winslett, 218 A.D.2d 148, 153; see also, Lieberman v. Hoffman, 239 A.D.2d 273). Clearly, the letter was written by defendants in an attempt to settle the claim by plaintiff's client, and its contents, which, in any event, primarily consist of non-actionable opinions, were relevant and pertinent to that claim.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.