From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DIOMED HOLDINGS

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Sep 20, 2007
Case No. C05-02972 MMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C05-02972 MMC.

September 20, 2007

HOWARD A. SLAVITT (State Bar # 172840), RACHEL G. COHEN (State Bar # 218929), COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY BASS, LLP, San Francisco, California, MICHAEL A. ALBERT (admitted pro hac vice), MICHAEL N. RADER (admitted pro hac vice), LAURA TOPPER (admitted pro hac vice), WOLF, GREENFIELD SACKS, P.C., Boston, MA, Attorneys for Defendants, DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. AND DIOMED, INC.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL [CIV. LOCAL RULES 7-11, 79-5]


In conjunction with Defendants Diomed Holdings, Inc., and Diomed, Inc.'s ("Diomed") Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102- 103, Diomed filed a Joint Motion for Administrative Relief To File Documents Under Seal with respect to certain documents designated "confidential" pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order in this case. Based upon this motion and the Declaration filed by Plaintiff VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. ("VNUS"), pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), and good cause appearing therefore, Diomed's Joint Motion for Administrative Relief to File Documents Under Seal is GRANTED in part, specifically, the Clerk is directed to file under seal unredacted versions of the following documents:

• Exhibits KK, MM, and OO to the Declaration of Charles Steenburg in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102- 103; and
• Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102- 103.

With respect to Exhibit KK, only a portion of said exhibit is, for the reasons stated by VNUS, properly filed under seal. Accordingly, Diomed's motion is DENIED to the extent Diomed seeks leave to file the entirety of Exhibit KK under seal. If Diomed wishes the Court to consider the portion of Exhibit KK not designated as confidential by VNUS, specifically, any portion other than page 45:3-25, Diomed is DIRECTED to electronically file in the public record such portion(s) no later than September 25, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DIOMED HOLDINGS

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Sep 20, 2007
Case No. C05-02972 MMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2007)
Case details for

VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DIOMED HOLDINGS

Case Details

Full title:VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Sep 20, 2007

Citations

Case No. C05-02972 MMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2007)