From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vislocky v. Zupis Taxi, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 2, 2014
116 A.D.3d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-2

Amy VISLOCKY, respondent, v. ZUPIS TAXI, INC., et al., appellants.

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants. Kahn Gordon Timko & Rodriques, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Nicholas I. Timko of counsel), for respondent.


Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants. Kahn Gordon Timko & Rodriques, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Nicholas I. Timko of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated March 2, 2012, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

In light of our determination on a prior appeal, in which we affirmed an order granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Vislocky v. Zupis Taxi, Inc., 105 A.D.3d 731, 961 N.Y.S.2d 591), the instant appeal has been rendered academic. RIVERA, J.P., LOTT, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vislocky v. Zupis Taxi, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 2, 2014
116 A.D.3d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Vislocky v. Zupis Taxi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Amy VISLOCKY, respondent, v. ZUPIS TAXI, INC., et al., appellants.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 696
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2288