Opinion
Case No. 2:13-cv-855
05-01-2014
VISION FILMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-38, Defendants.
Judge Graham
Magistrate Judge King
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On December 31, this Court granted plaintiff's motion for extension of time until April 30, 2014, in which to demonstrate effective service of process. Order, Doc. No. 6. The Court specifically warned that there would be no extension of this date and that the claims against any defendant not served with process by this date would be dismissed. Id.
To date, the record does not reflect that service of process has been completed. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the claims asserted in this case be dismissed for failure to timely effect service of process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
________________
Norah McCann King
United States Magistrate Judge