From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Visconti v. Mandel

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2024
23-cv-06262-RMI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-06262-RMI

01-10-2024

MAHA VISCONTI, Plaintiff, v. ELAINE WENDY MANDEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

RE: DKT. NO. 2

ROBERT M. ILLMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a detainee. Plaintiff presents allegations pertaining to events that occurred in Los Angeles County. That county is located in the Central District of California. The acts underlying this civil rights complaint occurred in the Central District; also, the named Defendants are located in the Central District. Venue, therefore, properly lies in that district and not in this one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Visconti v. Mandel

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2024
23-cv-06262-RMI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Visconti v. Mandel

Case Details

Full title:MAHA VISCONTI, Plaintiff, v. ELAINE WENDY MANDEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

23-cv-06262-RMI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)