From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Virtue v. Birkholz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 10, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-2403 (WMW/DTS) (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-2403 (WMW/DTS)

12-10-2019

Joel John Virtue, Petitioner, v. Warden B. Birkholz, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the October 22, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkt. 15.) The R&R recommends denying Petitioner Joel John Virtue's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as moot and dismissing this matter. Objections to the R&R were not filed in the time period permitted.

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having carefully performed this review, the Court finds no clear error and adopts the R&R.

Based on the R&R and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The October 22, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 15), is ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner Joel John Virtue's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED as moot.

3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: December 10, 2019

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Virtue v. Birkholz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 10, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-2403 (WMW/DTS) (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2019)
Case details for

Virtue v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:Joel John Virtue, Petitioner, v. Warden B. Birkholz, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-2403 (WMW/DTS) (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2019)