From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Virginia E. P. Co. v. McCaleb

Supreme Court of Virginia
Mar 12, 1936
166 Va. 152 (Va. 1936)

Opinion

37050

March 12, 1936

Present, All the Justices.

AUTOMOBILES — Collision between Automobile and Bus — Contributory Negligence of Automobile Driver a Jury Question — Case at Bar. — In the instant case, two actions to recover for personal injuries and for damage to an automobile, resulting from a collision between the automobile and a bus, one assignment of error was that the driver of the automobile was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Held: That the question of contributory negligence of the operator of the automobile was one for the jury.

T. Justin Moore, A. G. Robertson and W. H. Venable, for the plaintiff in error.

Ivor A. Page, Jr., and Preston P. Taylor, for the defendants in error.


Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.


These two cases arise out of a collision at an intersecting street between an automobile owned by T. S. McCaleb and operated at the time by Nancy McCaleb, and a bus of the Virginia Electric and Power Company. They were submitted to a jury and verdicts and judgments against the Power Company resulted in favor of Nancy McCaleb for personal injuries and in favor of T. S. McCaleb for damage to his automobile.

There are two assignments of error in each case: First, that the driver of the McCaleb automobile was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; and, second, that the doctrine of the last clear chance had no application, and, even if it did apply, it was improperly defined in instruction one offered by the plaintiff and granted by the court.

We have carefully considered the evidence in the cases, and are of opinion that the question of the contributory negligence of the operator of the McCaleb automobile was one for the jury, and that it was submitted to the jury under proper instructions.

We are also of the opinion that the application of the doctrine of the last clear chance to the evidence in these cases and the granting of instruction one in which the doctrine was defined do not constitute reversible error.

The judgments are affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Virginia E. P. Co. v. McCaleb

Supreme Court of Virginia
Mar 12, 1936
166 Va. 152 (Va. 1936)
Case details for

Virginia E. P. Co. v. McCaleb

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY v. NANCY McCALEB and VIRGINIA ELECTRIC…

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Mar 12, 1936

Citations

166 Va. 152 (Va. 1936)
184 S.E. 244