From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Virgin Scent, Inc. v. BT Supplies W., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 22, 2022
CV 21-184-DMG (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-184-DMG (ASx)

04-22-2022

Virgin Scent, Inc. dba Art Naturals v. BT Supplies West, Inc.


PROCEEDINGS: IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS LORI KAUFMAN AND MICHAEL STEINHARDT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On April 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed a declaration stating that Plaintiff has been unable to effectuate service on Defendants Lori Kaufman and Michael Steinhardt. [Doc. # 22.] Plaintiff stated it intended to obtain discovery on this issue from Defendant BT Supplies, Inc.

Plaintiff has not filed proofs of service for Kaufman and Steinhardt and the time to do so has long passed. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to show cause why Plaintiff's claims against Kaufman and Steinhardt should not be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file a response by no later than May 6, 2022. Failure to file a timely and satisfactory response will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against Kaufman and Steinhardt, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Virgin Scent, Inc. v. BT Supplies W., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 22, 2022
CV 21-184-DMG (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Virgin Scent, Inc. v. BT Supplies W., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Virgin Scent, Inc. dba Art Naturals v. BT Supplies West, Inc.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

CV 21-184-DMG (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2022)