From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Virgil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 3, 2005
894 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

affirming convictions for aggravated battery and aggravated assault

Summary of this case from Solomon v. State

Opinion

No. 5D04-1130.

January 28, 2005. Rehearing Denied March 3, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Frank N. Kaney, Senior Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lamya A. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm Virgil's convictions for aggravated battery and aggravated assault, finding no double jeopardy violation. See Casselman v. State, 761 So.2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (finding single episode in which defendant struck victim and then attempted to hit him sufficient to sustain charges of assault and battery). We reverse the court's restitution order, however, as the State correctly concedes that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter such an order after Virgil filed her notice of appeal. Queen v. State, 832 So.2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). We remand this matter back to the trial court for a restitution hearing. Pearson v. State, 686 So.2d 721, 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; RESTITUTION ORDER REVERSED; REMANDED.

SHARP, W., and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Virgil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 3, 2005
894 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

affirming convictions for aggravated battery and aggravated assault

Summary of this case from Solomon v. State
Case details for

Virgil v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willie Joyce VIRGIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 3, 2005

Citations

894 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Solomon v. State

Both aggravated assault and aggravated battery require the use of a deadly weapon, but kidnapping does not.…

Armstrong v. State

Finally, Mr. Armstrong argued that the trial court violated double jeopardy principles by convicting him of…