From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinson v. Winwell Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Jun 30, 2005
224 S.W.3d 269 (Tex. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 08-05-00041-CV.

June 30, 2005.

Appeal from the 160th District Court of Dallas County, Texas (TC# 03-5514-H), Joe Cox, Judge.

James Neil Floyd, Fort Worth, for appellants.

Paul Cameron Sewell, Dallas, for appellee.

Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.


OPINION


Pending before the Court on its own initiative is the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP. P. 42.3(b). This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant in a civil case fails to timely file its brief and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. See TEX.R.APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On December 20, 2004, Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal in this cause. As of this date, no Appellants brief nor motion for extension of time has been filed with the Court. On May 16, 2005, this Courts clerk sent a letter to the parties indicating the Courts intent to dismiss the case for want of prosecution absent a response from any party within ten days to show grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has been received as of this date. Accordingly, pursuant to TEX.R.APP. P. 42.3(b) and (c), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Vinson v. Winwell Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Jun 30, 2005
224 S.W.3d 269 (Tex. App. 2005)
Case details for

Vinson v. Winwell Co.

Case Details

Full title:Troy VINSON, Lindsey Vinson, and Rocky Mountain Logistics, Inc.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

224 S.W.3d 269 (Tex. App. 2005)