Opinion
No. 05-05-01075-CR
Opinion Filed June 22, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 219-82277-03. Affirmed.
Before Justices FITZGERALD, FRANCIS, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
As part of a plea bargain agreement, Christie Ann Vinson pleaded guilty to possession of less than one gram of cocaine, and the trial court sentenced her to two years in state jail, suspended the sentence, and placed appellant on community supervision for five years and fined her $750. Nine months later, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant's community supervision, alleging twelve violations of the conditions of appellant's probation. Appellant entered an open plea of true to the violations, and the trial court revoked her probation and sentenced her to two years in state jail. She appeals the trial court's judgment revoking her probation. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant she has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.