From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vines v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2115 CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2115 CKD PS

02-27-2013

MICHAEL VINES, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant has filed an answer in this action. Pursuant to the scheduling order, the time has now passed for plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment and/or motion for remand. The parties were advised in the scheduling order that the court is not responsible for reminding them of scheduling deadlines and that failure to adhere to the schedule may result in sanctions, including dismissal. L.R. 110. Plaintiff also was advised that plaintiff has an affirmative duty to prosecute this action, and that failure to do so may result in a dismissal for lack of prosecution. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff show cause in writing, no later than March 11, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4 vines2115.ss.oscnomsj


Summaries of

Vines v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2115 CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Vines v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL VINES, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2115 CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)