In Vincent v. Sands (42 How. Pr. 231, which was affirmed in 58 N.Y. 673, without opinion) FREEDMAN, J., laid down the same principles, citing Boughton v. Otis and Shaler Hall Quarry Company v. Bliss.
Summary of this case from Union Bank v. KeimArgued September 24, 1874
Decided October 6, 1874
Robert N. Waite for the appellant.
Frederick C. Coudert for the respondent.
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Vincent v. Sands (42 How. Pr. 231, which was affirmed in 58 N.Y. 673, without opinion) FREEDMAN, J., laid down the same principles, citing Boughton v. Otis and Shaler Hall Quarry Company v. Bliss.
Summary of this case from Union Bank v. KeimFull title:VICTOR VINCENT, Respondent, v . ALFRED B. SANDS, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 6, 1874
In Shaler Hall Quarry Company v. Bliss ( 27 N.Y. 297) SELDEN, J., laid down the same rules as were stated by…
Sinclair v. DwightIt was held ( Shaler Hall Quarry Co. v. Bliss, 27 N.Y. 297) that only the directors of a manufacturing…