From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinasco v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jan 27, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2006)

Summary

holding ineligibility was proper where PSR indicated prisoner possessed loaded gun at time of arrest for § 1956 charge even where firearm possession did not result in either separate conviction or sentence enhancement

Summary of this case from Canty v. Quintana

Opinion

Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT.

January 27, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated December 23, 2005. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed, if any.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 4) is DENIED with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vinasco v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jan 27, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2006)

holding ineligibility was proper where PSR indicated prisoner possessed loaded gun at time of arrest for § 1956 charge even where firearm possession did not result in either separate conviction or sentence enhancement

Summary of this case from Canty v. Quintana
Case details for

Vinasco v. Bauknecht

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR VINASCO, Petitioner, v. DONALD F. BAUKNECHT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2006)

Citing Cases

Canty v. Quintana

ses themselves do not necessarily entail violence in their commission. Cf. Ardry v. Rios, 215 F. App'x 776…