From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villar v. Olazabal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 26, 1996
675 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-1458.

June 26, 1996.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robbie M. Barr, Judge.

Beckham Beckham and Pamela Beckham, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Stephens, Lynn, Klein McNicholas and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's order dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint because as a matter of law the impact rule bars these causes of action and the facts of this case do not fall within the narrow exceptions to the impact rule. See Zell v. Meek, 665 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 1995); Champion v. Gray, 478 So.2d 17 (Fla. 1985); Sguros v. Biscayne Recreation Dev. Co., 528 So.2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1988).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Villar v. Olazabal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 26, 1996
675 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Villar v. Olazabal

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS VILLAR AND ARGELIA VILLAR, APPELLANTS, v. DR. BERTHA M. OLAZABAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 26, 1996

Citations

675 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)