From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villar v. Conagra Foods Enter. Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 11, 2022
CV 16-4422 DSF (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

CV 16-4422 DSF (JPRx)

07-11-2022

VALENTIN VILLAR, Plaintiff, v. CONAGRA FOODS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

DALE S. FISCHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On October 25, 2016, the Court approved the parties' stipulation for arbitration and ordered that the parties file a joint status report every six months. The parties have previously failed to file timely status reports and have not filed a status report since December 2020. Because all of Plaintiff's claims are subject to arbitration, and the parties continually fail to follow this Court's orders, this action is dismissed. See Brennan v. Opus Bank, 796 F.3d 1125, 1134 (9th Cir. 2015) (affirming district court's order dismissing action in favor of arbitration); Thinket Ink Info. Res., Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 368 F.3d 1053, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004) (stating that district court did not err in dismissing claims subject to arbitration and noting that FAA allows but does not require a stay of court proceedings); Sparling v. Hoffman Constr. Co., 864 F.2d 635, 638 (9th Cir. 1988) (affirming trial court's dismissal of claims referred to arbitration); Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 586 F.2d 143, 147 (9th Cir. 1978).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Villar v. Conagra Foods Enter. Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 11, 2022
CV 16-4422 DSF (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Villar v. Conagra Foods Enter. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:VALENTIN VILLAR, Plaintiff, v. CONAGRA FOODS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

CV 16-4422 DSF (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2022)