From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villalobos v. Bosenko

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2013
2:13-cv-00109 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)

Opinion


RAMON VILLALOBOS, Plaintiff, v. TOM BOSENKO, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-00109 DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. October 2, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff indicates that he is currently incarcerated at "Shasta County Jail/D.V.I. Tracy[.]" (ECF No. 2 at 1.) Because it is not clear from his application where plaintiff is currently incarcerated, the court will order plaintiff to file a notice of his current address, as well as, a new application to proceed in forma pauperis if he is no longer incarcerated at the Shasta County Jail. Plaintiff is also advised that it is his responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. E.D. Local Rule 182(f).

Plaintiff is cautioned that the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis must be completed and signed by an authorized prison official. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In addition, plaintiff must submit a certified copy of his prison (or jail) trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Within fourteen days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall file a notice of his current address and a new application to proceed in forma pauperis if plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at the Shasta County Jail. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action;

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with the court's application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner; and

         3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on plaintiff at both the Shasta County Jail and Deuel Vocational Institution.


Summaries of

Villalobos v. Bosenko

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2013
2:13-cv-00109 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Villalobos v. Bosenko

Case Details

Full title:RAMON VILLALOBOS, Plaintiff, v. TOM BOSENKO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-00109 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)