Vildosola v. Hornbeak

Full title: PATRICIA INEZ VILDOSOLA, Petitioner, v. TINA HORNBEAK, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 12, 2010

CV 08-6590-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2010)

Opinion

PATRICIA INEZ VILDOSOLA, Petitioner, v. TINA HORNBEAK, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-6590-VAP (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 12, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice.