Opinion
Case No. 1:10-cv-01977-LJO-SAB-PC
04-26-2016
WILLIE PAUL VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES YATES, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No.35) ORDER THAT THIS ACTION PROCEED ON THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT VALENCIA FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 18, 2016, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this action proceed on the third amended complaint against Defendant Valencia on Plaintiff's claim of excessive force, and that the remaining claims and Defendants be dismissed.Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 18, 2016, are adopted in full;
2. This action proceeds on the third amended complaint against Defendant C/O Valencia on Plaintiff's claim of excessive force.
3. Defendants Yates, Diez, Espino, King, O'Brien, Howard, Solo, Das, and Brown are dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim against them;
4. Plaintiff's medical care claim is dismissed for failure to state a claim; and
5. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for service of process of the third amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26 , 2016
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE