From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vigil v. Saul

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jun 17, 2021
CV 20-632 CG (D.N.M. Jun. 17, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-632 CG

06-17-2021

KRISTA VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AWARD ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for EAJA Fees (the “Unopposed Motion”), (Doc. 31), filed June 17, 2021. The Court, having reviewed the Unopposed Motion under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, finds the Unopposed Motion is well-taken and shall be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $5, 616.00 in attorney fees pursuant to EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, made payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiffs attorney. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiffs counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiffs counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vigil v. Saul

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jun 17, 2021
CV 20-632 CG (D.N.M. Jun. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Vigil v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:KRISTA VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Jun 17, 2021

Citations

CV 20-632 CG (D.N.M. Jun. 17, 2021)