From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vidurek v. Pollen

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 6, 2021
20 CIVIL 6714 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 6714 (CS)

10-06-2021

JOHN VIDUREK, KIMBERLY VIDUREK, and JAMES VIDUREK, Plaintiffs, v. PIM POLLEN, MARGARETH DE WIT, ALESSANDRO DONETTI, N. CASSADINE, J. MELENDEZ, SUSAN LAMASTRO, JEANETTE WILLET, FRANK J. CHAN, CHARLES P. RETTIG, BOBBI S. MARTIN, THE CBE GROUP, INC., STEVE DOUGLAS, MIKE FROST and RANDALL KAMM, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 5, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs' claims against the Federal Defendants with prejudice and their claims against the CBE Defendants without prejudice. The Court specified, however, that the dismissal of the claims against the CBE Defendants would be converted to one with prejudice if no motion to amend was made by September 28, 2021. No. such motion has been made, and accordingly the claims against the CBE Defendants are dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Vidurek v. Pollen

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 6, 2021
20 CIVIL 6714 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Vidurek v. Pollen

Case Details

Full title:JOHN VIDUREK, KIMBERLY VIDUREK, and JAMES VIDUREK, Plaintiffs, v. PIM…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 6714 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2021)