From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vetter v. Gifford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
No. 3-11-0379 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3-11-0379

04-02-2012

THOMAS VETTER v. CHRISTOPHER GIFFORD


ORDER

By order entered January 17, 2012 (Docket Entry No. 16), a telephone conference call with the Court and counsel for the parties was scheduled on May 18, 2012. However, the Court has developed a scheduling conflict on that date.

Therefore, the conference call is RESCHEDULED to Friday, May 11, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., to be initiated by defendant's counsel, to address whether the parties participated in mediation and, if so, if the were able to reach a settlement and, if so, when they will file an agreed order of dismissal and, if not, whether the potential for settlement remains and to address needed extensions of scheduling deadlines provided in the orders entered June 8, 2011 (Docket Entry Nos. 13-14).

On January 13, 2012, counsel advised the Court that they planned to participate in mediation with Steve Cox in mid-April.

If this rescheduled date presents scheduling conflicts for counsel, they shall confer and call Ms. Jeanne Cox, Courtroom Deputy, at 736-5164, to reschedule.

It is so ORDERED.

___________

JULIET GRIFFIN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Vetter v. Gifford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
No. 3-11-0379 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Vetter v. Gifford

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS VETTER v. CHRISTOPHER GIFFORD

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

No. 3-11-0379 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 2, 2012)