From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vetrone v. Care

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Jan 30, 2014
843 N.W.2d 711 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013AP315.

2014-01-30

Joyce VETRONE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. COOPERATIVE CARE, a Wisconsin cooperative, Defendant–Appellant.

U.S. Oil Co., Inc. v. Midwest Auto Care Servs., Inc., 150 Wis.2d 80, 89, 440 N.W.2d 825 (Ct.App.1989) (emphasis added). Vetrone has not asserted that she either acted or forbore to act based upon the existence of the policy. There are no facts from which it could be inferred that she decided to retire, for example, in reliance upon the expectation that she would receive the five annual payments. If Vetrone offers this letter as evidence of justifiable reliance, then her reliance on this as evidence of action or forbearance is misplaced, as the letter was written and sent after her retirement, as is clear from its terms.



Summaries of

Vetrone v. Care

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Jan 30, 2014
843 N.W.2d 711 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Vetrone v. Care

Case Details

Full title:Joyce VETRONE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. COOPERATIVE CARE, a Wisconsin…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Jan 30, 2014

Citations

843 N.W.2d 711 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
352 Wis. 2d 754
2014 WI App. 24

Citing Cases

Winfield Sols., LLC v. W S AG Ctr., Inc.

Second, as Winfield points out, a member's interest in a cooperative is not debt, but rather is an equity…