Vessell v. Knagenhjelm

Full title: George Vessell, Appellant, v. Jane M. Knagenhjelm, personally; The Estate…

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 5, 2011

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-540 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-540

12-05-2011

George Vessell, Appellant, v. Jane M. Knagenhjelm, personally; The Estate of Ludvig Knagenhjelm; the Unknown Heirs of Ludvig Knagenhjelm; Jane M. Knagenhjelm, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ludvig Knagenhjelm and Kathy Knagenhjelm, Respondents.

George Vessell, pro se, of Summerville. Christopher David Lizzi, of North Charleston, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal from Dorchester County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

George Vessell, pro se, of Summerville.

Christopher David Lizzi, of North Charleston, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM : On appeal, George Vessell asserts multiple issues regarding a circuit court order that memorializes an agreement between Vessell and Jane Knagenhjelm, Kathy Knagenhjelm, and the estate and unknown heirs of Ludvig Knagenhjelm. We dismiss¹ pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Calcutt v. Calcutt, 282 S.C. 565, 572, 320 S.E.2d 55, 59 (Ct. App. 1984) ("It is well settled an appeal will not be entertained from an order by consent.").

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.