Summary
In Versatile, we affirmed on the reasoning of the district court its decision accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on another plaintiff's RLUIPA claims concerning NOGE.
Summary of this case from Coward v. JabeOpinion
No. 12-6211
07-20-2012
LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Leon Coward, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director Virginia DOC; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations; BENJAMIN A. WRIGHT, Chairman Publication Review Board; W. D. JENNINGS, Ph.D, Formal Chairman Publication Review; LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Sussex I Prison; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director, Defendants - Appellees.
Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00120-HEH-MHL)
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lord Versatile appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on Versatile's action alleging violations under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Versatile v. Johnson, No. 3:09-cv-00120-HEH-MHL (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED