Verizon N.Y., Inc. v. Mills

2 Citing cases

  1. Michael Mulgrew v. Board of Education

    31 Misc. 3d 296 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)

    ( See Matter of Anonymous v Board of Educ. for Mexico Cent. School Dist., 162 Misc 2d 300 [Sup Ct, Oswego County 1994]; Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562.) In Matter of Verizon NY, Inc. v Mills ( 24 Misc 3d 1230[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 52616[U] [Sup Ct, Westchester County 2007], mod 60 AD3d 958 [2d Dept 2009]), the court held that a party will have standing to challenge the release of records of which it is the subject if it can establish that the administrative action will have a "harmful effect" on it and that it is within the "zone of interest" to be protected by the statute. ( See 24 Misc 3d 1230[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 52616[U], *2 [2007], citing Matter of Dairylea Coop, v Walkley, 38 NY2d 6.)

  2. Mulgrew v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

    31 Misc. 3d 296 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011)   Cited 1 times

    See Anonymous v. Board of Education for the Mexico Central School District, 162 Misc.2d 300, 616 N.Y.S.2d 867 (Sup.Ct., Oswego Cty. 1994); Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v. Burns, 67 N.Y.2d 562, 505 N.Y.S.2d 576, 496 N.E.2d 665 (1986). In Verizon New York Inc. v. Mills, 24 Misc.3d 1230(A), 2007 WL 6847312 (Sup.Ct., Westchester Cty., 2007), aff'd,60 A.D.3d 958, 875 N.Y.S.2d 572 (2nd Dept.2009), the court held that a party will have standing to challenge the release of records of which it is the subject if it can establish that the administrative action will have a “harmful effect” on it and that it is within the “zone of interest” to be protected by the statute. See24 Misc.3d 1230(A), 2007 WL 6847312 ( citing Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. Walkley, 38 N.Y.2d 6, 377 N.Y.S.2d 451, 339 N.E.2d 865 (1975)).