Vereen v. State

Full title: GRAYLING L. VEREEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 10, 1994

637 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-691.

June 10, 1994.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Daniel P. Dawson, Judge.

Grayling L. Vereen, Orlando, in pro. per.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).¹

1 We note that the order denying the 3.850 motion is also insufficient. A copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that Vereen is entitled to no relief is not attached to the order as required by Rule 3.850(d).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.