From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verduzco v. Jao

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
2:22-CV-0569-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-0569-TLN-DMC-P

04-20-2022

DANIEL VERDUZCO, Plaintiff, v. B. JAO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, granted.

The sufficiency of Plaintiff's complaint and service thereof will be addressed separately.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Verduzco v. Jao

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
2:22-CV-0569-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Verduzco v. Jao

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL VERDUZCO, Plaintiff, v. B. JAO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-0569-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)